|
Post by havoc on Dec 9, 2006 20:57:11 GMT
Yep "castellated" it probably is. But as non-native english speaker, I didn't want to try that out on a knowledgable audience :- I understand your wish to stay away from it. To execute that joint with the correct clearances would be a major undertaking in itself. Never mind making a boiler, we are going to make joints! And if you succeed in it, then covering it with lagging? From what I read about it in "the books" it is more used on thicker plate like >3mm. Then you would have sufficient area for the solder. But the use of a single wrapper and a formed plate between the wrapper and the barrel would be the best solution. It solves the issue of joints by having no joints. (better said by replacing it with a better type of joints)
|
|
|
Post by Malcolm on Dec 9, 2006 21:58:07 GMT
When I built my Simplex (many years ago), as a beginner I followed Martin Evans' advice to use a castellated joint. Never again! The silver solder kept cracking along the joint edges as the boiler cooled. I had to grind off the firebox wrapper side and remake with an internal strap; a lot of work., but entirely successful.
|
|