|
Post by jgb7573 on Jul 11, 2007 11:15:37 GMT
At our running day last Saturday, we had trouble with one engine when it's eccentrics hit a concreted level crossing on it's approach to the steaming bays. The concrete was above the rail height with flangeways to allow wheels through. Obviously the concrete should not have been like this and was swiftly chipped back, and the club is doing what it can to fix the damaged engine. However, this raises a question. What clearance should be allowed above rail height? There must be some, if only to allow for inaccuracies or wear in multi-gauge points (our 3.5" rail does not get nearly as much wear as our 5" rail). But are there standards for this clearance? If there are no standards, what would we regard as an acceptable clearance above rail height? 3mm has been discussed down at the club but it sounds quite a lot to me.
|
|
|
Post by baggo on Jul 11, 2007 12:15:52 GMT
Hi John,
I am not aware of any 'standards' as such but I would have thought 3mm would be a bare minimum. Any loco design that allows parts such as eccentric straps to come down to rail height or near is asking for trouble on ground level tracks with points etc. I appreciate that this may be difficult to achieve though on 'narrow gauge' types with small driving wheels.
John
|
|
|
Post by ahernem on Jul 11, 2007 21:51:17 GMT
The GL5 Main Line Association has a standard for this area, (amongst others). It can be found at:- www.gl5.org/assets/images/running_gauge.gifIt calls for no closer than 0.25" (6mm) above rail height below the loco, So the concrete may well have been OK if that standard was applied at that site. Hope this helps.... Mike
|
|