|
Post by lordsimon on Aug 21, 2007 19:28:48 GMT
It’s a real Shame
Things you should do? Cry Bang your head on the wall Try to work out if they live on a different planet Why?
I and many of you love to look at a steam engine, We all like to imagine owning or building one But we all no how much they cost. Casting, materials, nuts, bolts, rivets and most of time.
So why do so many people not use common sense when trying to build, a Steam engine even if they have never built one before.
We all are prone to making mistakes and most of use will start again or repair depending on what part its. So why do people that make a mistake just carry on without thinking of what’s it going to happen in the long run.
I am in the process of rebuilding an engine for someone he bought it at a fair price and it was almost complete at first look its ok till you look again, it looks like 2 people have been building this engine over time.
Frames
The stretchers are in the right place and some of the main holes then we go Swiss cheese elongated holes chucks missing holes here there and every where must be hand drilled even nuts and bolts as plug for odd holes.
Why would you do this? What a waste almost scrap
Cylinders
Bits added on holes in wrong place over done the valve ports and been filled with silver solder, steam chests no square to the valve
Why would you do this? Nearly 300 pound for the bin
Motion work
Now this fascinating some of the parts was perfect need a clean but very good, then we get connecting rods that are short out of shape crossheads don’t even go there So on the boiler and some of the motion is well made
That’s just one engine I have had and found others some worse
Now why would you just through so much money in the bin as in common sense would say stop when thing don’t go right till you can make it right. Why carry on to waste things twice.
I no you can make a few mistake and get away with them but why?
|
|
abby
Statesman
Posts: 927
|
Post by abby on Aug 22, 2007 5:25:28 GMT
Not really sure what you are trying to say here Simon or what your question is , but , like any "DIY" job , there are people who can give the experts a lesson, people who make a complete balls up and every level in between. Model making hobbies are about enjoying a pastime creating something , and the person who created the piece of junk you describe probably got more entertainment value from it than a professional building to museum standards . Many of the older models which turn up as unfinished projects were started in the days when owning a lathe was a dream, materials had to be "gleaned" from work and the file , hacksaw and hand-drill were kings. Have a look at Grandad's toolbox - or remember it if you can , then imagine how you would build a model steam engine - often after working a fifty or sixty hour week of hard graft. Like restoring a classic vehicle , you now have the pleasure of putting the job right so be happy not critical !
|
|
|
Post by Jo on Aug 22, 2007 6:27:49 GMT
Hi Abby, Nothing wrong with gleaning from work.... Except that engineering companies seem to revolve around paper these days. They have even had the cheek to ban me from recycling from the skip ; on health and safety grounds . What is the world coming too? Simon: vintage engines have you thought what is right? Are you restoring it as a historical piece for a family to treasure as an heirloom made by one of their relatives or seeking to create a modern model? Jo
|
|
|
Post by lordsimon on Aug 22, 2007 7:19:31 GMT
i can see what you all are saying which if it was a classic i would have a lot of respect.
But it is a moden simplex and a ruby thats no older than 15 years old.
what i am saying is why would you continualy drill about 10 holes in the same area to place one item or go so far off the drawing that things added would never work in a million years this is modern stuff.
now it will be a nice mission too try and rebuild in one way but its very hard to repair not scrap
loads of welding!!!!!!!!!!!
now if it was a classic this would a pleasure
so the question is why would you drill so many hole with a hand drill knowing that it will be wrong when you could do a better job with a drill press if needed even with simple tooling and a little more time you can do a better job?
if knowing this why would you do it twice on both sides?
knowing how much things are why destroy them even for fun?
if people in my information building for my company say go to a local club and most members would give you a hand as i have been told?
|
|
|
Post by lordsimon on Aug 22, 2007 7:30:03 GMT
sorry one more example
motion brackets most engine have like a double flange at the top to bolt to the frames
now why would one side be cut half off and the other have both
and have loads of holes in in the wrong place and extra
these are casting so these cost loads these will need scraping
But i must say it is all funny but why?
|
|
|
Post by mmaidnz on Aug 22, 2007 7:34:30 GMT
Simon,you do need to remember that model engineers come from all sorts of backgrounds.Some of us have no engineering training at all,thus having to learn from mistakes.That these mistakes are sometimes carried forward is sometimes due to inexperience,other times perhaps financial reasons.Materials are expensive,so I for one will use a slightly off-size item if it will still do the job. Although I haven't made big mistakes with my cylinders(just one broken tap in a hole),my frame does have a few extra holes.Unless you're building a "hangar queen",these aren't going to make a scrap of difference in the running of a loco. This hobby is for my personal enjoyment,and when i'm dead and gone,I'm not worried about who has to run or repair my engine.That in itself will teach future owners something about model engineering
|
|
|
Post by Jo on Aug 22, 2007 8:11:21 GMT
Simon: Clearly it sounds like restoration of other people's engines is not for you....
|
|
|
Post by Tel on Aug 22, 2007 9:27:09 GMT
I get that impression as well
|
|
|
Post by mutley on Aug 22, 2007 9:33:44 GMT
Might be worth pointing out that Simplex and Ruby are both descibed as being suitable as first time builds. You are always going to get a higher proportion of mistakes on those models as a result.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 22, 2007 12:51:14 GMT
As a new boy, one who has yet to commit to a project, it seems to me that there is a right and a wrong way of going about a first engine.
My method is to have a go at everything using cheap metal and bits from the bin, when I have got the basics right I will try something more detailed but there is no way I am going to risk a set of cylinder castings until I am sure I can get it right.
I can quite see that the excitment of getting an engine on the go is perhpas too much for some but I still think that time practice and patience are the greatest virues.
I managed to buy a load of odd castings on ebay for a few quid and I am having fun,
|
|
|
Post by GWRdriver on Aug 22, 2007 13:05:07 GMT
What a disappointment. I thought this sort of thing only happened in the USA.
I once bought a part-built Maid of Kent (built in UK) which upon closer inspection appeared to have been done by two people. The chassis and platework were superb, but the boiler and fittings were so utterly miserable as to need to be sawed up.
|
|
abby
Statesman
Posts: 927
|
Post by abby on Aug 22, 2007 14:21:28 GMT
I hope you bought it at the right price Harry , what with the price of copper going through the roof some boilers are worth more now as scrap than boilers LOL!
|
|
|
Post by GWRdriver on Aug 22, 2007 15:27:26 GMT
I did Indeed Abby, at a very right price, . . . and I was prudent (realistic?) enough to admit its shortcomings and acquire plates and tube from the old Reeves before everything went wonky. And you are in a sense correct . . . The scrapped boiler (now sawn in half) is presently worth somewhat more as scrap than I paid for the replacement materials from Reeves.
There was a period of time, a window of opportunity, some years ago when I could acquire sets of formed plates from Reeves for less money than the plate alone would cost me here. . . . those were the days . . . .
|
|
|
Post by lordsimon on Aug 22, 2007 15:43:28 GMT
Sorry if you got me wrong what i mean is with a little bit more thought by the person who put all the hole and other things may have made less of a mess.
dont get me wrong this is not to slate off any one or to say that i cant do things i can make and do most things and i am happy to repair and sort out any thing.
all it is a question with little less speed and a bit of thought you can do things even with a hand drill file and saw if needed
you can make some cool things with a set sqaure rule center punch scribe
in stead of plunging a drill in driffrent places hopeing for the best
This a discusion thought to help new people in doing it the right way and set things out within there means without making a complete mess
take your time
sorry if you think i am trying to slate people off i am not it is to highlight not to complety build an engine that may never work for the case of a little more time and thought
dont make me out to be an bad one because you dont Know me and the people who do would say i am the niciest freindlest person around and i would do any thing for any one
dont put me down and if you have a comment that is not polite dont paste it please
you dont no me
simon
|
|
Myford Matt
Statesman
There are two ways to run a railway, the Great Western way, and the wrong way.
Posts: 621
|
Post by Myford Matt on Aug 22, 2007 17:21:10 GMT
Don't worry Simon, I don't think anyone was having a go at you; I'm sure none of us think any the less of you.
They were just pointing out that for many of us getting things wrong can be as informative as getting things right.
|
|
|
Post by alanstepney on Aug 22, 2007 17:47:55 GMT
I have been rebuilding a couple of my early efforts at loco building. When I look at them now, I cringe at some of the bodges I did, mistakes I made and covered up, poor workmanship, etc. However, they did run eventually, (and kept going for 40 years), despite the engineering being poor. (And that is an understatement.)
Experience and practice gradually improved what I made.
However, the most important thing is that right from the start, I ENJOYED myself. That is, after all, the point of a hobby.
Others could (and may still) look at my work and criticise it, but I had fun, and relaxation from work. I would love to be able to build award winning models, but doubt I ever will. Nevertheless, what I make satisfies me, and that is all that matters.
Now, returning to the engine that Simon mentioned, without knowing the skills and limitations under which the original builder operated, I wont comment. All I will say is that I hope he (or perhaps she) enjoyed himself.
|
|
|
Post by GWRdriver on Aug 22, 2007 19:25:05 GMT
Alan, I have exactly such a project under my bench right now. It was my first completed loco project, a "Little Engines" 4-4-0 in 7.5"ga, and a number of years ago I pulled it out with the intentions of going back to right all the wrongs done to it (which were many.) I quickly realized my time would be far better spent letting it be what it was and use what I learned to make the next loco a much better job.
|
|
|
Post by lordsimon on Aug 22, 2007 20:37:18 GMT
See this is intressting of wot lurk under the bench
but my point was even with mistakes would you still make them over and over on the same model
i.e if i put a hole in the wrong place would make sure all the rest were in the right place and make a point of any modifaction just for that hole
|
|
paul
Member
Posts: 8
|
Post by paul on Aug 22, 2007 20:59:47 GMT
I get that impression as well Dry as ever Tel.
|
|
|
Post by alanstepney on Aug 22, 2007 21:05:45 GMT
Harry, As you, and I, well know, it can take far longer to repair an engine than to build from scratch. A fact that many find suprising.
The part-built "bargains" one often sees advertised are often hardly worth buying, if the workmanship used requires more-or-less a complete rebuild.
|
|