|
Post by atgordon on Jan 12, 2019 3:33:50 GMT
Although I haven't started the build of my Super Simplex, I have been using end-of-day time to put all the drawings into my CAD/CAM package (Fusion 360). I have recently come across a problem with the valve gear. Either I have messed up, or Martin Evans is 0.047" short! I am trying to fit the combination lever from the valve gear crosshead to the main crosshead via the anchor link and it doesn't fit! They are clearly out of alignment. I checked all the Super Simplex errors pages, and no one else has mentioned this problem, so I'm guessing that I am missing something very simple and obvious ... The graphic below shows how things should work ... The following shows the problem I'm having: If anyone is a Fusion user, they can find the file HEREI have two drawings that can be downloaded that show the dims I'm using as well, as well as ME's original drawings. DRAWING 1 CYLINDER ASSEMBLYDRAWING 2: Martin Evan's crossheadDRAWING 2 CROSSHEAD ASSEMBLYAppreciate any advice! Thanks, Tony
|
|
uuu
Elder Statesman
your message here...
Posts: 2,856
|
Post by uuu on Jan 12, 2019 11:56:37 GMT
Can you fit the "outside cover plate with drop arm" in either of two ways - with the drop arm inwards instead of outwards?
Wilf
|
|
|
Post by atgordon on Jan 12, 2019 15:39:36 GMT
Can you fit the "outside cover plate with drop arm" in either of two ways - with the drop arm inwards instead of outwards? Wilf Nope ... although I did check that! Martin Evan's drawing shows it assembled facing out (plus, reversing it would set it back 0.218" - 0.109" x2 which is way more than the 0.047" I need).
|
|
gt
Member
any info for building a 5" coffee pot loco
Posts: 1
|
Post by gt on Jan 17, 2019 9:01:12 GMT
I had the same problem, after checking the dimensions many times i made new outer crosshead plates to fit the alignment
|
|
|
Post by atgordon on Jan 18, 2019 4:55:51 GMT
I had the same problem, after checking the dimensions many times i made new outer crosshead plates to fit the alignment Thanks, that's what I ended up doing (well, in CAD). Instead of a 7/64 (0.109") offset as per ME, I have gone for 1/16 (0.0625") which evens everything up beautifully. I'm sure a 3/64" off isn't much in our small scale locos (so the combo lever is off to one side by 47 thou ... big deal!) but CAD is unforgiving ... thankfully! Wish there was a better way of noting drawing errors. We're not the first to notice this and won't be the last I'm sure! Tony
|
|
JonL
Elder Statesman
WWSME (Wiltshire)
Posts: 2,988
|
Post by JonL on Jan 18, 2019 10:36:00 GMT
|
|
|
Post by builder01 on Feb 2, 2019 15:20:50 GMT
I'm looking at the error presented here. After going over my own Super Simplex drawings, the error is quite real. My Super is up and running and has been for well over a 2 years. I will have to go out to the shop to see what is going on here on my completed Super. Probably what has happened, the combination lever is not exactly straight up and down. It probably splays out from the locomotive to fit into the union link. There is nothing keeping the combination lever exactly vertical, so, it has probably been swung outward (by 3/64") to meet the clevis of the union link. Not really a big deal, but it actually can be built even with the error. (I did, oh well!).
What to do about it, looks like modifying the drop link plate to get the pin in the "right", or at least "better" position for the union link.
|
|