simonp
Active Member
Posts: 15
|
Post by simonp on Nov 18, 2009 12:05:53 GMT
Here is a picture (see general chat) is it possible to identify the design from this? Attachments:
|
|
|
|
Post by welshy on Nov 18, 2009 20:18:59 GMT
The Reeves (Scarth) Stirling does not have split eccentrics as yours does, but yours does looks more true to scale so could be a modified Reeves design or a differant design. Sorry i couldnt help any more.
Mike
|
|
simonp
Active Member
Posts: 15
|
Post by simonp on Nov 19, 2009 9:35:33 GMT
Thanks, the parts I have are made to a high standard but what is strange is things are either finished or missing. The cylinders are done but there are no valves, inlet or exhaust holes and the chests have not been drilled for the rods. There is no pump but the hole and fixing holes are done. I have a bag of bits which I think are part of the brake gear but there are no holes in the frames.
I will see if I can get a decent picture of the frames.
Does anyone know where other designs are available?
|
|
|
|
Post by klendo on Nov 20, 2009 7:53:54 GMT
Didnt Clarkson do one?
|
|
simonp
Active Member
Posts: 15
|
Post by simonp on Nov 20, 2009 10:08:55 GMT
I have now been told that this was not being built to a published design, hopefully it will be possible to adapt one to complete the missing items.
If I can get it to run on air then it would presumably be worth carrying on.
|
|
