Post by paul on Mar 2, 2006 22:55:17 GMT
The book I've been referring to whilst making my boiler & fittings shows a safety valve where the 'business end' consists of a ball bearing blocking a 1.5mm hole. The ball is held in place by a small spring that bears down on an inverted 'T' shaped guide rod (I don't know why I'm describing this as it seems to be the norm for valves on little engines!).
The guide rod has a 'cup' to fit over the ball. Does anyone have a suggestion as to how this cup can be made, keeping in mind the ball is 4mm dia and I'm using hand tools and a drill press only (short of whacking the ball into softer metal!)? Would it be possible (or rather, advisable) to dispense with the ball altogether and make the guide rod a simple inverted 'T' shape that covers the hole? To my simple mind the pressure required to lift a flat surface would be no different to that required for a curved surface (whoa...brain tells me that may be wrong since the ball presents a fractionally larger surface area for the pressure to act upon but at these dimensions the difference must be tiny).
Here's the safety valve from my first model (I had to 'adapt' the instructions that came with the kit - the M3 nut on the valve did not fit through the M6 nut that formed the bush! Filing the flats off the smaller nut meant the valve could be removed for servicing/adjusting etc). I wonder whether this very simple arrangement is better than the ball bearing idea?
Sorry about my terminology... I can see you guys cringing already ;D
The guide rod has a 'cup' to fit over the ball. Does anyone have a suggestion as to how this cup can be made, keeping in mind the ball is 4mm dia and I'm using hand tools and a drill press only (short of whacking the ball into softer metal!)? Would it be possible (or rather, advisable) to dispense with the ball altogether and make the guide rod a simple inverted 'T' shape that covers the hole? To my simple mind the pressure required to lift a flat surface would be no different to that required for a curved surface (whoa...brain tells me that may be wrong since the ball presents a fractionally larger surface area for the pressure to act upon but at these dimensions the difference must be tiny).
Here's the safety valve from my first model (I had to 'adapt' the instructions that came with the kit - the M3 nut on the valve did not fit through the M6 nut that formed the bush! Filing the flats off the smaller nut meant the valve could be removed for servicing/adjusting etc). I wonder whether this very simple arrangement is better than the ball bearing idea?
Sorry about my terminology... I can see you guys cringing already ;D